Skip to content

Research

Four programmes, all pointed at the same problem: knowing a nuclear cross section at the energies where stars use it, rather than only where a beam can reach.

2020–present · Laboratori Nazionali del Gran Sasso, INFN

LUNA — proton capture, deep underground

Working Group Leader (19F + p, since 2024) · DAQ Coordinator (since 2024)

The reactions that burn hydrogen in the CNO cycle have cross sections that fall exponentially towards stellar energies — at the Gamow window they can reach the picobarn scale, which at the surface of the Earth is indistinguishable from cosmic-ray background. LUNA's answer is 1.4 km of dolomite overburden, which suppresses the muon flux by six orders of magnitude and makes the measurement possible.

For 12C + p and 13C + p radiative capture, at LUNA and at Felsenkeller, I led the analysis and half of the measurement campaign. The results substantially reduced the uncertainty of the proton-capture rates on both carbon isotopes and of the astrophysical 12C/13C ratio that depends on them. I now lead the 19F + p working group at LUNA's 400 kV accelerator, underground at Gran Sasso.

I am also the collaboration's DAQ Coordinator: I designed and run the data-acquisition and slow-control infrastructure of LUNA's current campaigns and of the 3.5 MV machine at the Bellotti Ion Beam Facility (BIBF). It lets shifts be taken remotely, which is no small thing for an experiment under 1.4 km of rock.

  • 12C(p,γ)13N and 13C(p,γ)14N cross sections and their impact on the 12C/13C ratio
  • Working Group Leader for 19F + p at the LUNA 400 kV accelerator
  • Calibration of the 3.5 MV Singletron; Geant4 tuning for the BGO and HPGe setups
  • R-matrix evaluations for 12C + p, 13C + p, 20Ne + p and 22Ne + p
The reactions, in the atlas

Jun 2025 – present · Open source · used internationally

AZURE2 — R-matrix code

Maintainer and Lead Developer

AZURE2 is where a set of measured points becomes a cross section: a multi-level, multi-channel R-matrix model fitted to data across every channel that shares a compound nucleus, then extrapolated to the energies at which stars burn. It is used across academia, national laboratories and the IAEA.

Since taking over as maintainer I have worked on the parts that decide whether a modern analysis is feasible at all: analytic gradients and the residual Jacobian computed inside the forward model, so a fit or an MCMC no longer pays a factor of a few hundred for finite differences; a tabulate-once reaction-rate integrator; polarization observables; identical-particle scattering. I also look after the graphical interface and the documentation, and support and train the user community.

The evaluations on this site run the same code on real analyses, published and unpublished.

Open the evaluations

2023–present · Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, INFN

AGATA — a sub-femtosecond lifetime in 15O

Spokesperson

The 6.79 MeV state in 15O sits about 0.5 MeV below the proton threshold. Capture into this state carries most of the low-energy S-factor of 14N(p,γ)15O, the slowest step of the CNO cycle and therefore the reaction that sets the cycle's rate and the CNO neutrino flux. As a subthreshold resonance, the state also shapes the ground-state transition, and that contribution scales with its radiative width, i.e. with the inverse of its lifetime. The lifetime is shorter than a femtosecond and the published values disagree; a γ-ray tracking array has the position resolution to measure it precisely from the Doppler shift.

I am the spokesperson for the measurement made with AGATA at Legnaro and led the full analysis: Doppler correction, kinematic reconstruction, Geant4 simulation and the Bayesian extraction of the lifetime itself. The analysis is complete and the manuscript is under review at Nature Physics.

2024–present · GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Darmstadt

CRYRING — electron screening in inverse kinematics

Participant

Every laboratory measurement of a low-energy cross section is made with atoms, not bare nuclei, and the electron cloud screens the Coulomb barrier. The enhancement it produces grows as the energy falls, which is where astrophysics needs the number, and measured screening potentials have persistently come out larger than theory allows.

At CRYRING the 15N + p reaction is studied in inverse kinematics with a stored, cooled beam, which changes the atomic configuration of the collision and so tests the discrepancy in a way a conventional target experiment cannot.

What comes next

A measurement is only as useful as the data, the code and the model that survive it. My next years are about making all three last, and about giving R-matrix analyses new kinds of information.

  • Open data that stays open. Too many good measurements have been lost because nobody kept the data, or the software that reads them, alive. With modern tools, maintaining that software is no longer the burden it was, so preserving data is within every collaboration's reach. I want the data of the experiments I take part in to be FAIR (findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable) from the moment they are recorded, and I am developing the LUNA data acquisition to that end.
  • A database of R-matrix evaluations. R-matrix theory is where theory meets every detail of an experiment: resolution, target effects, normalizations, angular distributions. That is why I love it. Yet most evaluations live in one person's files. The field needs a shared, versioned database of evaluations that anyone can rerun, refit and extend when new data arrive. This is the aim of GENESIS (NSF, 2026–2031), a project on quantum-enhanced R-matrix evaluation of nuclear cross sections in which I take part, and of my work as a member of the IAEA INDEN network for light elements (INDEN-LE). AZURE2 and the evaluations on this site, which anyone can open, change and rerun in the browser, are a working prototype; the rate explorer shows where such evaluations end up: in the reaction rates of stellar models.
  • New observables, underground. I want to keep contributing to LUNA's measurements, and to bring new kinds of information to them: a segmented, AGATA-like γ-ray detector deep underground, and polarization measurements, which give the R-matrix input independent of the cross section. The starting points are the measurements I already lead: 19F + p at the LUNA 400 kV accelerator, and the lifetime of the 6.79 MeV state of 15O measured with AGATA, which constrains the CNO rate and its neutrino flux.
  • Working across the whole experiment. I enjoy moving between the accelerator, the detectors, the simulations, the data acquisition and the theory, and I think an experiment needs people who can.
  • AI as a research tool. Used with care, AI takes over the maintenance and boilerplate that used to swallow our time, leaves more of it for physics, and puts a much broader set of tools within reach of a small group. LUNA Skills is how I put this into practice, openly, so that others can do the same.